Sunday, February 17, 2013

Blog Entry # 2 (Double Indemnity p. 3-70)


Double Indemnity is a masterpiece of its own, I have not read any book about noir and this one gives me a better understanding about the concept. “Nightmarish, weird, erotic, ambivalent and cruel” is how Raymond Borde and Etienne Chaumeton described noir on their article “Towards a Definition of Film Noir”. Double Indemnity falls perfectly under this category and I will base that on two things, one is the plot and second is the characters.
            Borde and Chaumeton state that “it is the presence of crimes which gives film noir its most constant characteristics…Few cycles in the entire history of film have put together in seven or eight years such a mix of foul play and murder” indeed, this are all present in this story. A foul play and a murder that is brilliantly plan in a span of six weeks by two people (Walter and Phyllis) all because of money and the idea of love that they thought they have. The murder is plan carefully and with accuracy, from the place, the materials and the people, a program of a stage accident designed to kill a man is what they created and studied for weeks. The evil course of actions takes place on a car and the railroad; it was described in full details. It is like a living nightmare reading this book; I feel the darkness, the danger, the suspense and the fear of the characters, Like I’m part of it, a main witness hiding on the bushes watching the murder, shaking to death and scared to get caught.
           
            The other element of noir that this story has is the characters. “He is often enough masochistic, even self-immolating, one who makes his own trouble…At times he is a passive hero who allows himself to be dragged across the line into the gray area between legal and criminal behavior” is how Borde and Chaumeton described the characteristic of the protagonist. It is played well by Mr. Walter Huff; an insurance agent fell in love with his client’s wife. The mastermind of everything, the reason for killing is love and money. He planned everything on his own without knowing that he is being played and manipulated by the sweet and lovely femme fatal in the character of Phyllis. In agreement with Borde and Chaumeton “femme fatal is fatal to herself, frustrated and deviant, half predator, and half prey, detached yet ensnared. She falls victim to her own traps” Her first attack is the night he invited him over when their maid is off, a little kiss is how their team up started.  It was his idea and she goes along with him, I know there something odd about her, by playing innocent, she follows him too much and let him do all the dirty work. She has him around his neck controlled like a puppet without him knowing it, blinded by his emotions and interest to her is the power she has over him. She is very dangerous in a way that no one can see it, everything is an act, it is her own show, directed by her, produce and written by Walter but all the credits goes to her.

            The last aspect that can determine that this story is indeed a work of noir is because it is a crime from within. The author did a good job on touring us inside the mind of a criminal like Walter, how it works, why he does it and how he does it. To be able to see what a criminal see and feel how he feels gives me chill, it is the ghastly side of life and this story illustrate a fatalistic interpretation of a reality. So there is no doubt that Double Indemnity is classify as a work associated with film noir.

5 comments:

  1. Nice picture, also good job on describing Double indemnity ....this is also my first noir book that I read and I also thought it was great and it helped me get a much better understanding of what noir is . Right away I felt like part of the story too. Crazy to see how manipulating a women could be to get a complete stranger to fall in love with her so quickly and to help her murder her own husband all for some Insurance money. Funny you mention how she has him blinded and is controlling him like a puppet , I completely agree. He
    Is so blinded he did all the dirty work as far as killing her husband goes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice! I also think that's a good desciption of Double Indemnity. Like Kelly(the post above), this is also my first noir style book. So i'm finding very interesting seeing visuals of this one. I really liked how much detail the book goes into in the planning of the murder, and the murder itself. I think you picked good quote to go along with your points.
    Do you think it was her(Phyllis) that went along with him, or the other way around? I see your point, my prespective was that she was manipulating him, and getting the idea in his mind. So it would look like his ideam, but she was in control. I could be wrong, that was simply how i viewed it.
    I also really like how you put this, "She is very dangerous in a way that no one can see it, everything is an act, it is her own show, directed by her, produce and written by Walter but all the credits goes to her.". I think that's pretty much spot on how it is. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would absolutely agree with most of your description of Phyllis. She is playing him hard, and he will all to soon realize it I think, to his detriment. By the end of the book one or both of them will be dead, I think, falling victim to their own plot. The only thing that, to me, she lacked was the whole "seductive" vibe. I am actually still confused as to how they (Walter and Phyllis) ended up coming to be a "couple". It just kind of happened, without any real reason. I don't know if it was bad writing, or just something I missed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thank you Kelly and Jacob. Keith, I agree with you, you feel that way because everything happened so fast between them. They met once, then cup of tea, a kiss, and the planning of murder started. I think Walter himself is as psycho as Phyllis and thats the reason why they get along so well, he even said that there something about her he can't quite figure out. You know when you meet someone like you or a person you have a lot in common and you guys just click in a heartbeat. It probably happened the same way with them :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like how you wrote that she, Phyllis, is in control of the whole situation; you described it perfectly which I defiantly agree with you. When I read that you said that it gives you the chills when you "see" through the criminals eyes, it put a smile on my face because I know exactly how you felt, Cain did an amazing job writing this novel, by making the reader feel that they are right there with Walter and Phyllis during the murdering scene.

    ReplyDelete